This document reflects emerg-ing clinical and scientific ad-
vances as of the date issued andis subject to change. The infor-
mation should not be construedas dictating an exclusive course
of treatment or procedure to be followed.
ABSTRACT: Anthrax infections are diagnosed by isolating Bacillus anthracis
from body fluids or by measuring specific antibodies in the blood of personssuspected to have the disease. It is recommended that asymptomatic pregnantand lactating women who have been exposed to a confirmed environmentalcontamination or a high-risk source as determined by the local Departmentof Health (not the women’s health care provider) receive prophylactic treat-ment. A variety of antimicrobial regimens are available. Although some of
tem, or transmitted, in any formor by any means, electronic,
these drugs may present risks to the developing fetus, these risks are clearlyoutweighed by the potential morbidity and mortality from anthrax. Guidelinesfor prophylactic treatment of anthrax and treatment of suspected active casesof anthrax are changing continually, and the Centers for Disease Control andPrevention web site should be consulted for the latest recommendations.
Anthrax is an infection caused by Bacillus anthracis, an aerobic, gram-
positive, spore-forming, nonmotile bacillus species. There are three primary
clinical manifestations of the disease: 1) cutaneous, 2) inhalational, and 3)
Cutaneous: This is the most common presentation, accounting for 95% of
naturally occurring infections. The organism’s portal of entry is a cut or
abrasion on the skin. The areas of greatest exposure are the hands, arms,face or neck. Potential sources of the organism include wool, hides, and
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
leather and hair products of infected animals, particularly goats. Exposure
also may result from a bioterrorist act (eg, a contaminated letter). Incubation
periods may be as long as 12 days. Skin infection begins as a raised prurit-
ic papule, resembling an insect bite. Within 1–2 days a vesicle develops, fol-lowed by a painless ulcer 1–3 cm in diameter with a characteristic black
necrotic eschar in the center. Localized lymphangitis and painful lym-
nant or lactating women exposed toanthrax. ACOG Committee Opinion
phadenopathy may occur. Although antibiotic therapy does not appear to
change the course of eschar formation and healing, it does decrease the risk
of systemic disease. Mortality rates are 20% if untreated, but less than 1%
Inhalational: This is the most serious presentation,
evolving. For the latest recommendations consult
resulting from deposition of spore-bearing particles
the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
of 1–5 μm into the alveolar spaces. Macrophages
ingest the spores that are then transported to the pul-
monary lymphatics where they germinate. Theasymptomatic incubation period usually is 1–7 days
Exposure
after exposure, but spores may germinate in the medi-
For asymptomatic individuals with low-risk expo-
astinal lymphatics for up to 60 days. Once germina-
sure, antimicrobials are not warranted until there is
tion occurs, replicating bacteria release toxins leading
an evident risk of actual exposure based on microbi-
to hemorrhage, edema, and necrosis. Initial symp-
ologically documented anthrax as determined by
toms resemble a flulike illness with fever, cough, and
law enforcement and public health authorities. The
headache, but without rhinitis, followed by progres-
woman’s health care provider is not the party to val-
sive dyspnea that rapidly progresses to respiratory
failure and death within hours. Case-fatality estimates
In the current crisis, when screening for expo-
are extremely high, even with supportive care and
sure is deemed necessary, it is conducted by nasal
swab. The resultant secretions can be examined byGram stain and culture. However, given the lack of
Gastrointestinal: The relatively rare intestinal form of
reliability of nasal swab screening, postexposure
anthrax follows ingestion, deposition, and subsequent
prophylaxis is indicated only after confirmed or
germination of spores in the upper or lower gastroin-
high-risk suspected exposure. In the latter cases,
testinal tract. The former leads to the oral-pharyngeal
treatment can be stopped if anthrax is not docu-
form of the disease marked by oral-esophageal ulcers
and regional lymphadenopathy. The latter results in
For adult postexposure prophylaxis against
acute inflammation of the intestinal tract with symp-
anthrax infections, the CDC currently recommends
toms that include anorexia, malaise, nausea, vomit-
500 mg of ciprofloxacin orally every 12 hours for 60
ing, and fever. Subsequently patients infected with
days or 100 mg of doxycycline orally every 12 hours
gastrointestinal anthrax develop abdominal pain;
hematemesis; severe, bloody diarrhea; and sepsis. Intestinal anthrax may be fatal in 25–60% of cases;the effect of early antibiotic therapy is unknown. Management of Exposed Asymptomatic Pregnant or Lactating Women Evaluation and Management of Possible
At this time, the Committee on Obstetric Practice
Anthrax Exposure Caused by
recommends that prophylaxis of asymptomatic
Bioterrorist Acts
pregnant and lactating women be limited to thosewomen who have had exposure to a confirmed envi-
The risk of anthrax exposure is remote for people not
ronmental contamination or who are exposed to a
in direct contact with the contaminated object or site
high-risk source as determined by the local
and is greatest for those present in the immediate
Department of Health. Prophylaxis for asympto-
vicinity of contamination. The disease is not spread
matic pregnant or lactating women is 500 mg of
by casual contact or by coughing and sneezing.
ciprofloxacin orally every 12 hours for 60 days (6).
Ciprofloxacin and other fluoroquinolones gen-
Active Infection
erally are not used during pregnancy and lactation
Anthrax infections are diagnosed by isolating B
because of suggested irreversible drug-induced
anthracis from the blood, cerebrospinal fluid, skin
arthropathy associated with such treatment in a vari-
lesions, or respiratory secretions or by measuring
ety of species of adolescent animals (1–5). However,
specific antibodies in the blood of persons suspected
no clear evidence of teratogenicity has been demon-
to have the disease. Rapid diagnostic immunoassays
strated in humans (1–5). Despite these concerns, the
and polymerase chain reaction are available at
potential morbidity and mortality from anthrax
national reference laboratories. Strategies of antimi-
clearly outweighs these risks. Thus, if the bacteria
crobial treatment of active anthrax infection are
are shown to be sensitive to penicillin, the treatment
should be switched to 500 mg of amoxicillin orally
2. Friedman JM, Polifka JE. Doxycyclicne. In: Teratogenic
effects of drugs: a resource for clinicians (TERIS). 2nd ed. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000:
If a woman has been prescribed ciprofloxacin
and is found to be pregnant, she should continue her
3. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. U.S. Food and
course of antibiotics for the full 60 days (6) unless
Drug Administration. CIPRO (Ciprofloxacin) use by
the bacteria are shown to be penicillin-sensitive. She
pregnant and lactating women. Available at http://www.
should then be switched to amoxicillin. A 1999
fda.gov/cder/drug/infopage/cipro/cipropreg.htm. Retrieved November 2, 2001
expert review of published data on experiences with
4. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. U.S. Food and
ciprofloxacin concluded that therapeutic doses dur-
Drug Administration. Drug preparedness and response to
ing pregnancy are unlikely to pose substantial ter-
bioterrorism. Available at http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug
atogenic risk, but the data are insufficient to state
prepare/default.htm. Retrieved November 2, 2001
that there is no risk (1). In the case of penicillin- and
5. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. U.S. Food and
Drug Administration. Doxycycline (Vibramycin,
ciprofloxacin-allergic patients, treatment should
Monodox, Doryx, Doxy, Atridox, Periodox, Vibra-Tabs)
consist of doxycycline or penicillin desensitization
use by pregnant and lactating women. Available at
should be considered if the organism is proved sen-
http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/infopage/penG_doxy/doxy
sitive (6). In this situation, the risks of anthrax
would far outweigh the risks of doxycycline to the
6. Updated recommendations for antimicrobial prophylaxis
among asymptomatic pregnant women after exposure to
fetus (ie, dental staining of the primary teeth and
bacillus anthracis. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2001;
possible depressed bone growth and defective den-
The guidelines for prophylactic treatment of
anthrax and treatment of suspected active cases of
Resources
anthrax are continually evolving. Please refer to
Inglesby TV, Henderson DA, Bartlett JG, Ascher MS, Eitzen E,
www.bt.cdc.gov and www.cdc.gov/mmwr for any
Friedlander AM, et al. Anthrax as a biological weapon: medical
updates in CDC treatment guidelines.
and public health management. Working Group on CivilianBiodefense. JAMA 1999;281:1735–1745[erratum JAMA2000;283:1963]
References
Update: investigation of anthrax associated with intentionalexposure and interim public health guidelines, October 2001.
1. Friedman JM, Polifka JE. Ciprofloxacin. In: Teratogenic
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2001;50:889–893
effects of drugs: a resource for clinicians (TERIS). 2nd ed. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000:
Use of anthrax vaccine in the United States. MMWR Morb
LEY N° 19549 LEY NACIONAL DE PROCEDIMIENTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS . TEXTO ACTUALI ZADO CON LAS REFORMAS DE LA LEY 21686 PROCEDIMIENTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS TITULO I Procedimiento Administrativo: Ambito de aplicación. * ARTICULO 1°). Las normas del procedimiento que se aplicarán ante la administración pública nacional centralizada y descentralizada, inclusive entes autárquicos con ex
Ectopic pregnancy: laparoendoscopic single-sitesurgery—laparoscopic surgery through a singlecutaneous incisionRicardo Francalacci Savaris, M.Dand Leandro Totti Cavazzola, M.D. a Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetrıcia e Programa de Pos-Graduacx~ao em Medicina, Ci^encias Cirurgicas da UniversidadeFederal do Rio Grande do Sul; and b Servicxo de Cirurgia Geral do Hospital de Clınicas de