Sito in Italia dove è possibile acquistare la consegna acquisto Viagra a buon mercato e di alta qualità in ogni parte del mondo.

Lep 1.5.15-15

Ultrasonic diffraction at different single and double slit systems
Related topics
Longitudinal waves, Huygens’ principle, Interference, 1. Record the intensity of an ultrasonic wave diffracted by var- ious slits and double slits as a function of diffraction angle.
2. Determine the angular positions of the maximum and mini- Principle
mum values and compare them with the theoretical results.
A plane ultrasonic wave is subjected to diffraction at singleslits of various widths and at various double slits. The intensi- Set-up and Procedure
ty of the diffracted and interfering partial waves are automati- Set up the experiment as shown in Fig. 1. Exact adjustment of cally recorded using a motor-driven, swivel ultrasound detec- Equipment
Adjustment of the goniometer:
Use the adjusting screws at the back of the mirror and under its stem to set the mirror by eye to a vertical position and align it to the zero line of the goniometer table.
Power supply f. ultrasonic unit, 5 VDC, 12 W Slide the transmitter tightly against the mirror and align it to the height of the centre of the mirror.
Slide the transmitter back to fit the 16 cm long adjusting rod in the hole in the centre of the mirror. The rod must point directly to the middle of the transmitter. Should this not be the case, again use the adjusting screws to re- adjust the mirror. Remove the rod so that the transmitter can be brought to the focal point of the mirror. The dis- tance from the centre of the mirror must be exactly PHYWE series of publications • Laboratory Experiments • Physics • PHYWE SYSTEME GMBH & Co. KG • D-37070 Göttingen Ultrasonic diffraction at different single and double slit systems
To adjust the height of the receiver, turn it with its swing arm as near as possible to the mirror. It might be neces- Faulty intensity modulation may occur in spectra as a result of sary here to first unlock the transport stop (to do this, pull interference in the measurement field. To keep such interfer- the yellow screw of the swing arm beneath the goniometer ence as small as possible, do not carry out experiments in too table). Bring the receiver to the same height as the trans- narrow rooms or in the direct vicinity of reflecting surfaces (walls, cupboards etc.). It is recommended that the measuring Set the receiver swing arm to zero. The axis of the receiv- and supply instruments be installed behind the mirror if possi- er must correspond with the goniometer zero line.
ble. Further to this, the person carrying out the experiment Bring the receiver to the end of the swing arm.
should not stand too close to the measurement field.
When adjustment is properly made, the axes of the mirror, Should asymmetries occur in the intensities in spectra, these transmitter and receiver must be on a common line and can as a rule be avoided by slightly turning the object holder this must be exactly above the zero line of the goniometer around the 90° line on the goniometer table.
Fit the object holder with its centering pin in the central Theory and Evaluation
socket of the goniometer table, with the feet of the holderpointing to the mirror. Position the holder on the 90° line on When a wave hits a slit then, acc. to Huygens’ principle, spherical waves are emanated from each point of the slit To prepare the slit and double slit, carefully insert the cor- opening. The individual partial waves interfere with each other responding metal sheets in the guide grooves of the object behind the obstacle. According to their phase position, they holder, then align these exactly centrally symmetrical with intensify each other in certain directions, or extinguish each the zero line of the goniometer table.
other. In the direction of the incident waves (w = 0) (see Fig. 2), To avoid interfering sound reflections, use the carrier foam all partial waves have the same phase and intensify each as wave absorbent. Place it between the object holder and mirror, tightly against the holder and with its opening sym-metrically towards the diffraction object.
Connection of instruments:
Connect the transmitter to the diode socket of the ultrasonicunit that is marked TR1, and operate it in “Con“ continuousmode. Connect the receiver to the left BNC socket (prior to theamplifier). Further, use the BNC cable to connect the analogoutput of the ultrasonic unit with the input of the control unit(pay attention to the polarity of the adapter), and the latter unitto the PC by means of the RS 232 data cable.
For control of the goniometer, connect the socket underneaththe goniometer plate with the control unit.
With the “Cal“ key of the control unit pressed (release of themotor drive) position the swing arm at 0°. Following this,deactivate the “Cal“ function.
Use the software to set the range of swing of the receiver to±50°.
Fig. 2: Diagram of diffraction at a slit.
To ensure proportionality between the input signal of thereceiver and its analog output signal, avoid operating theultrasonic unit amplifier in the saturation range. Should such acase occur and the “OVL“ diode light up, reduce either the With sound waves, the sound pressure p(w) is represented as transmitter amplitude or the input amplification of the receiv- a function of the diffraction angle w by the so-called slit func- er. It is purposeful here to adjust the amplification at the zero position of the receiver so that the “OVL“ diode just no longerlights up.
5 Measurements are described in the following.
Interference pattern of a slit of width b = 6 cm.
Where b is the slit width, l the wavelength of the sound and p Interference pattern of a slit of width b = 4 cm.
the alternating sound pressure that is recorded by the sound Interference pattern of a double slit of slit width b = 2.5 cm Equation (1) is also valid, in squared form, for transversal elec- tromagnetic waves (optics), as in this case the intensity is given by the square of the amplitude.
Set the measurement mode to repeat measurement.
For w = 0, an indefinite expression is obtained, as both the Interference pattern of a double slit of slit width b = 2.0 cm numerator and the denominator are null. Application of the and slit separation s = 5.0 cm. Subsequently repeat mea- l’Hospital rule shows, however, that for w = 0, the quotient surement with a single slit of width b = 2.0.
assumes the value 1. Zero positions are at sin u = 0, i.e. at PHYWE series of publications • Laboratory Experiments • Physics • PHYWE SYSTEME GMBH & Co. KG • D-37070 Göttingen Ultrasonic diffraction at different single and double slit systems
u = np (n = 1, 2, 3,.). From this, the positions of the minima As the central maximum does not generally lie exactly at 0°, it is purposeful to determine the angular distance 2 w betweentwo extremes lying symmetrically to the zero line. Table 1 listsboth 2 w angle of extremes determined from Fig. 3 and Fig. 4, as well as the wavelength values l calculated using equations The numerator in equation (1) becomes 1 when u = 1/2(2n+1)l,i.e. when u is an uneven multiple of p/2. Intensity maxima Table 1: Evaluation of the interference curves shown in Figs. 3 From equation (1) it also follows for the ratio of the intensities Fig. 3 and Fig. 4 each show interference patterns of ultrason-ic waves at single slits, but with different split widths b. The two curves were recorded using the same transmitter perfor- The mean value of the wavelength values listed in Table 1 is:l = (0.862±0.034) cm.
The transmitter operates at a frequency of f = 40 kHz. Fromc = f · l (c = 343.4 ms-1 at T = 20°C) it follows that, in com-plete agreement with the experiment, l = 0.858 cm.
The curves in Figs. 3 and 4 also show that, at a constant emit-ter performance, the intensity of the maximum of zero orderbecomes less when the slit width is reduced. For the corre- Fig. 3: Interference pattern of ultrasonic waves diffracted at a Fig. 5 shows a diagram of diffraction at a double slit. The slitwidth is again given by d and the distance apart of homolo-gous partial waves by the slit separation s.
Fig. 4: Interference pattern of ultrasonic waves diffracted at a Fig. 5: Diagram of diffraction at a double slit.
PHYWE series of publications • Laboratory Experiments • Physics • PHYWE SYSTEME GMBH & Co. KG • D-37070 Göttingen Ultrasonic diffraction at different single and double slit systems
With a double slit, the intensity distribution is given by: Table 2: Evaluation of the interference curve shown in Fig. 6.
Double split s = 5.5 cm and b = 2.5 cm. The slit function is now additionally modulated by a cos func- tion. The minima of the individual slits (1st class minima) arestill as previously. Additional 2nd class minima occur, howev- er, namely there where the cos function is null. This is always Additional 2nd class maxima occur when the cos factor is 1, With a little skill, the dimensions of the double slit can now be so chosen, that the 1st minimum of the single slit (1st classminimum) coincides with a minimum of the double slit (2nd class minimum). This is the case, for example, when s = 5/2 b, as the 1st minimum of the single slit then coincides with the 3rd minimum of the double slit. Fig. 7 shows such a case, with Fig. 6 shows the interference pattern of a double slit having the recording of the double slit curve superimposed on the Table 2 shows the corresponding evaluation and the values forl calculated from equations 5 and 6. A mean value of l = It can be seen that the single slit curve envelopes the double (0.848±0.035) cm is obtained. In Fig. 6, at w indentation is to be seen, that is concordant to the position ofthe first minimum of the single slit.
Fig. 6: Interference pattern of ultrasonic waves diffracted at a Fig. 7: Interference pattern of ultrasonic waves diffracted at a double slit of s = 5.5 cm and b = 2.5 cm.
double slit of s = 5.0 cm and b = 2.0 cm. (The single slitcurve always envelopes the double split curve) PHYWE series of publications • Laboratory Experiments • Physics • PHYWE SYSTEME GMBH & Co. KG • D-37070 Göttingen


Effects of pparg ligands on atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease

EFFECTS OF PPAR γ LIGANDS ON ATHEROSCLEROSIS AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE C. Fiévet and B. Staels, Institut Pasteur de Lille, Département d’Athérosclérose, Lille, F-59019 France, Inserm, U545, Lille, F-59019 France, Université de Lille 2, Lille, F-59006 Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are ligand-activated nuclear receptors regulating the expression of genes that


Expertenchat zum Thema "Leberprobleme" Dr. Lutz Mirow beantwortete Ihre Fragen im Livechat Hallo und herzlich willkommen zu unserem Expertenchat. Heute dreht sich von 11 bis 13 Uhr alles um das Thema Leberprobleme. Als Gesprächspartner steht uns und Ihnen der Chefarzt der Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie im Krankenhaus Mittweida, Dr. Lutz Mirow, Rede und Antwort. Sie

Copyright © 2010-2014 Medicament Inoculation Pdf